Saturday, December 8, 2012

Does Peter Racz agree with us--Spellman should be one term?

  We have to congratulate Peter Racz for bringing up during public comment that its better that our Supervisors only serve one term. And Peter Racz is one of Spellmans closest associates.
  He stated that it saves our county taxpayers a lot of money in retirement costs.  Therefore, he agrees with our feelings that Mr. Spellman, current Supervisor of District 5, that if he doen't resign, which if he has any honor at all he will do, and if he does not get recalled for his slurring e-mails, that he should only serve one term.

   Spellman made the statement during the meeting that your e-mails are your written word and proof of what you are saying, so he admits fully his disgusting responsibility of dispursing slurring e-mails.

   Supervisors need to be held to a basic honor and Spellman does not do that. He is an embarrassment to this county and the entire area.

   Why is he continuing to campaign from the pulpit. This should not be allowed. Your behavior is beyond sick, Mr. Spellman.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

how many others will spellman use or try to destroy on his way to trying to keep his supervisorial seat? he's out in my book!

Anonymous said...

You have to realize that Mr Spellman's religion, like that of Mr. Romney, doesn't allow women to have any power over them. Also, if you remember, Romney had problems with women in his local church.

Anonymous said...

Mormon men are considered all powerful. they make decisions, and whether they have good judgment or not, no one, especially women are allowed to challenge them. Shut up and do what you are told mentality.

Anonymous said...

He's not capable of making good decisions. Let
see, Yes, a shooting range next door to the Snyders and other neighbors is a good thing. And so is hounding poor black bears to death, treeing them and shooting them. Those are his great decisions. I could name more. He's a kook!