The State continues to question Mr. Schumaker about how he created the animation. He says
he used Jenna Lauers statement. She never saw anything. She only heard things.
The State wants to know how he created a video animation from a statement of something someone heard.
Police reports do not count, only testimony in the courtroom during trial only. So you don't know if your animation is relative to what was told in court.
He said "yes" it has been adjusted per the attorneys, nothing he has seen or heard himself. He said there was no evidence of anyone jumping out of the bushes or out of the darkness, they were just standing there facing each other. He said yes.
This guy is good at cross-examination. He said the animation simply went from one witness event to the next witness event as he was told.
All of the information about Mr. Good is from what Zimmerman's attorneys relayed to him. They told him where Good was standing? Yes, he said.
About the animation, is it true that the animation actually contains artificial light? Correct, he said. He made absolutely no attempt to make it like the night of the shooting. True.
How to instruct the people where to go and what to do that was prior to any trial proceedings. Based on police reported. He read Jenna Lauer and John Good's report.
Based on the 911 call by Jenna Lauer, who saw nothing? He showed certain figures doing certain things based on what Jenna heard.
On what video did Mr. Good say when he came in during Jenna Lauers 911 call. You were told what John Good was doing during the 911 call.
What in-court testimony was there to show that? There is nothing to show what Good was doing at the same time Jenna Lauer is on the phone?
He is trying to backtrack in non-exact estimations. John Good never used a stop-watch, and therefore nothing more than an estimation on your part.
No comments:
Post a Comment